|
FENNEMORE
CRAIG I-LAW
June 4,
2001
Fennemore Craig counsels clients on Internet, branding and
e-commerce issues and protection and commercial exploitation
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Clients
include a range of domestic and international businesses from
Internet start-ups to large multi-nationals, in industries ranging
from computer software and hardware to pharmaceuticals, toys,
games, optics, and electronics.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Steve
Winkelman at swinkelm@fclaw.com
or 602.916.5407.
Fennemore Craig
www.fennemorecraig.com
602.916.5000
Fennemore Craig News On
Line & E-Commerce Domain Names
Trademarks Trade Secrets Copyrights
Patents
FENNEMORE CRAIG NEWS
- Richard
Oney practices in the area of intellectual property, including
preparation and prosecution of U.S. and international patent
applications, intellectual property acquisition, transfer
and licensing, due diligence review, infringement and validity
analysis, and litigation. Rich has significant experience
in copyright, trademark, trade secret, unfair competition,
and Internet matters, including domestic and international
licensing and protection of software technology. His patent
experience includes preparation and prosecution of patent
applications in those industries as well as in Internet and
electronic commerce, business methods, audio, communications,
sporting goods and mechanical inventions. Rich has litigated
numerous technology and intellectual property matters, including
patent, copyright, trade secret, domain name and licensing
matters involving software, electronics, medical and pharmaceutical
companies.
- Rich
received his B.S. (1976), with high distinction, in electrical
engineering, from the University of Nebraska and his J.D.
(1983), cum laude, from Arizona State University College of
Law. He also is a member of the State Bar of Arizona, the
Maricopa County Bar Association, the American Bar Association,
and is admitted to practice in the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona,
and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
ONLINE
& E-COMMERCE ISSUES
- While
the process for a trademark owner to "stake a claim"
to a new .biz domain name has begun (and will last until July
9), staking a claim does not guarantee that the trademark
owner will get the domain name. Rather, the process alerts
others that one believes that one owns the trademark rights
to a domain name. However, when multiple applicants claim
a domain name, the name will be assigned randomly. The .info
process is slightly different but no more helpful to trademark
owners. For a .info domain name, trademark owners will have
a "sunrise" period in which to file applications
for their exact trademarks. If multiple claimants file, they
will be given time to resolve the dispute themselves, but
if they do not do so, the domain name will also be assigned
randomly. Link
Link
Link
- The U.S.
Department of Commerce has approved the ICANN-VeriSign deal,
which has been signed, to continue VeriSign's control of the
.com domain. As part of the Department's approval, VeriSign
agreed to give up the exclusive rights to run the .net domain
six months earlier than planned and to subject itself to annual
audits. Link
Link
Link
- The operator
of the new domain .pro says .pro will be offering .pro domain
names for registration by November or December. These domain
names will be for accredited professionals only.Link
- The Business
Software Alliance's recently released survey revealed that
software piracy losses approached $11.8 billion in year 2000.
About one out of three business software applications was
pirated in 2000 and over 150 companies have settled software
piracy charges totaling $6.2 million. Link
Link
- The U.S.
Attorney General has made it clear what he thinks of Internet
privacy: Not much. General Ashcroft views such privacy as
a stumbling block to law enforcement efforts. Link
- Amazon's
change in its privacy policy (which gave the Internet giant
the ability to disclose personal customer data in certain
circumstances) is not illegal, said the FTC. Link
- According
to a new survey, a majority of banks are unprepared to meet
the privacy requirements established in the U.S. law that
becomes effective on July 1, 2001. The privacy law was part
of the act that changed the anti-trust laws to allow banks,
insurance companies and securities companies to merge and
share information. Link
- Over
77% of U.S. businesses electronically monitor employees, according
to a report from the American Management Association. Link
- Studies
are showing that men and women are using e-mail differently.
Women tend to use e-mail extensively as an extension of the
way they talk and connect and build relationships with others.
. . . Men are terse. At the same time, the researchers have
also noticed that e-mail allows inhibited people, male or
female, to be more expressive. Link
- Internet
metaphor of the month: The White House was hit with a "denial
of service" virus rendering the whitehouse.gov website
inaccessible. Link
Link
DOMAIN
NAMES
- As reported
in a previous I-Law issue, a cybersquatter was sued by Ford
Motor company after switching the destination of his domain
name "[vulgarity]generalmotors.com" from the General
Motors' website to the Ford website. What was unknown previously
is that the cybersquatter is the same person being sued by
the movie industry for posting DVD de-encryption software
on the Internet. He defends the vulgar domain name as a "hyperlink
joke." Link
- Czech-mate.
A porn website named after Czech President Vaclav Havel's
wife has been sued by the Czech President. Some of the women
displayed on the first few pages of the site are reported
to bear a striking resemblance to the Czech First Lady. Link
- Aimster,
the file sharing company that piggybacks on AOL's instant
messaging service, was found to be cybersquatting on AOL's
trademarks with numerous domain names including aimster.com.
However, Aimster plans to sue to keep its domain names. The
first link is an article about the UDRP ruling and the second
link is an article about Aimster's plans to sue AOL.
Link Link
- A cybersquatter
was forced to transfer hughhefner.com to Playboy. Ironically,
the pornography empire displaced an entity called Good Samaritan,
which completely failed to respond to the UDRP action. Hmmm,
usually it is Good Samaritans displacing cybersquatting porn
empires. Link
- We have
diapers, a crib, a baby bottle and...a domain name??? Yes,
that's right. A hospital in Silicon Valley has teamed up with
a domain name provider to issue free domain names to any baby
born in the hospital. moon-unitjr@zappa.com, here we come.
Link
- A UDRP
proceeding for determining ownership of a domain name is not
"arbitration" under federal law. Therefore, a court's
review of a UDRP decision is not limited to an evaluation
of "arbitrator misconduct, serious procedural flaws,
or 'manifest disregard of the law'." Link
- Is antidisestablishmententarianism.com
available? According to domainstats.com, 35 million domain
names have been registered, 22 million of those in the .com
domain. Good luck finding your domain. Link
- Lockheed
Martin has recovered the domain name lockheedmartin.org. Interestingly,
the unsuccessful registrant of the domain name argued that
he was a critic of the Chinese government who needed a neutral
sounding corporate domain name to get his e-mails and his
website past China's censors. Link
TRADEMARK
ISSUES
- Take
it off, take it all off. The University of North Carolina
has sued a porn site over the site's use of the school's UNC
trademark both on the site next to pictures of nude women
and in the domain name uncgirls.com. The University is seeking
to have all of its trademarks removed from the site and the
domain name.
Link
TRADE
SECRET ISSUES
- Employees
who take an employer's customer information are liable for
the act, even if the customer information does not rise to
the level of a trade secret. Link
COPYRIGHT
ISSUES
- Superbowl
champs sacked by the Supreme Court. An artist who sent a proposed
drawing of a logo to the Baltimore Ravens when the team was
picking its name, has won his claim that the team stole his
idea. The Supreme Court let stand the lower court's decision
in favor of the artist, thereby ending the team's legal challenge
to the decision. Game over. Link
- The clash
between copyright law and public views about downloading music
continues. A new report suggests that the public's belief
in free Internet music will be more powerful than copyright
law, and that the music industry should begin developing new
revenue models to protect itself rather than relying on copyright
law to do the job. Link
- Another
decision is gone with the wind. The U.S. 11th Circuit Court
of Appeals has lifted an injunction prohibiting the publication
of a Gone With The Wind sequel/parody (depending on your point
of view), called "The Wind Done Gone." The book
re-tells the original story, but from the perspective of a
slave. The Court viewed the injunction as an improper prior
restraint that violates the First Amendment. Link
PATENT
ISSUES
- An error
made by an applicant in the patent prosecution process will
not be enforced as a limitation on interpreting the patent,
so long as a person of reasonable intelligence would not be
misled into relying on the error. Link
C. OWEN
PAEPKE (602) 916-5384
ANNE L.
KLEINDIENST (602) 916-5392
RAY K. HARRIS,
Chair (602) 916-5414
RICHARD
E. ONEY (602) 916-5303
DAVID K.
GRAY (520) 879-6852
STEPHEN
R. WINKELMAN (602) 916-5407
SUSAN STONE
ROSENFIELD (602) 916-5317
STACIE KEIM
SMITH (602) 916-5451
JAMES M.
SHINN (602) 916-5436
SUSAN MOON
(602) 916-5394
|